Group Photo by Myles Boisen. Left to Right: Alex Kelly, Scott Walton, Steve Adams, Jon Raskin, Christina Stanley, John Shiurba, Tara Flandreau, Bruce Ackley, Gino Robair, Lawrence Ochs, Jason Hoopes, Jordan Glenn

Liner Notes for this package by Stuart Broomer:

"EYES OPEN AT ALL TIMES!"

Rova, Butch Morris and Conduction

No Favorites pays homage to one of the most original creators in improvised music, Lawrence “Butch” Morris, inventor of Conduction, a method for organizing large- ensemble improvisation that he took to the world. Morris died in January of 2013, and Rova mounted their tribute at Turkey’s Akbank Jazz Festival nine months later. The program represents a working relationship that Rova began with Morris in 1988 and also reflects parallel working processes reaching back to the mid-1970s.

Rova does more than simply pay tribute. The quartet’s members build on their own work in structured improvisation, incorporate other methods of organization— from graphic scores to conventional notation—and expand their palette from the saxophone quartet to include a string quartet and an electric power trio. Extending the possibilities of large-ensemble improvisation, the combined groups create music of both depth and an ever-changing surface, the fruit of both intense commitment and a highly creative, heterodox methodology. Like previous Rova expansions—the recently revived Rova Saxophone Octet, first convened in 1992; Orkestrova 2002 playing pieces by Satoko Fujii and Steve Adams; Electric Ascension (2003–2016); Rova & Nels Cline Singers (2008); and The Receiving Surfaces with John Zorn (2010)—it achieves complex music that both requires and rewards active listening.

Butch Morris

Setting out from Long Beach, California, “Butch” Morris initially established himself as a cornetist and composer in the free jazz scene of the 1970s, exploring milieus in San Francisco, New York, and Paris and playing with creative associates like Charles Moffett, David Murray, Alan Silva, and Steve Lacy. Dissatisfied with the often shapeless large-group improvisations of the ’70s New York loft scene, Morris began to seek other possibilities for organizing improvisation, eventually hitting on the idea of Conduction, shaping an improvisation with a series of coded gestures.

Given the radical democracy of free jazz, it’s easy to imagine the initial resistance that Morris’s singular repositioning as “conductor” would meet, but Morris could achieve indisputable results, finding ways to create, contrast, and organize sound that were satisfying to the musicians involved.

Conduction was a social vision as much as a musical one, built on a principle of community in which the musicians shared in the creative process, the conductor defining the form, the musicians supplying the detailed content. That social dimension is evident in the first Conduction, both in its title and the inclusiveness of Morris’s musical circle. Recorded at The Kitchen in New York in 1985, Current Trends in Racism in Modern America (Sound Aspects 4010) cut across stylistic demarcations, mixing free jazz stalwarts Frank Lowe and percussionist Thurman Barker with “Downtown” improvisers with ties to avant-rock and experimental, among them saxophonist John Zorn, harpist Zeena Parkins, and sound artist Christian Marclay on turntables. They were from two different scenes and with different responses, but Morris was developing a gestural language that could create fresh concordance out of the collisions.

Morris abandoned the cornet, his individual voice, concentrating on developing the vocabulary of signs that would come to make up the language of Conduction, seeking to develop a synaptic connection between conductor and players. ln his notes to the ten-CD Testament: A Conduction Collection (New World/Countercurrents 80478-2), Morris wrote, “Conduction not only relates to the act of ‘conducted improvisation,’ it is also the electric charge and response from body to body—the immediate transmission of information and result.”

In calling this tribute No Favorites, Rova emphasizes the breadth of Morris’s inclusive vision: “50% of my background is in jazz, the other 50% is in discovering who I am. . . . I’ve got influences—I like Samuel Barber and I like Marvin Gaye. . . . You can’t ask me who my favorite trumpet player is, because if you name one, you gotta name two, and if you name two, you gotta name three. . . . I don’t have a favorite composer, I don’t have a favorite trumpet player, I don’t have a favorite nothing.”

When Morris provided a detailed statement of his aesthetics for Rova’s Improv21, a series of “informances,” he envisioned a music in which relationships conquer details of style: “. . . by stripping away predispositions to value ‘this’ or ‘that’ in music, we also construct a mirror to the kind of relationships that subsist in society, and the wherewithal of music to challenge and transform them, a community in microcosm that functions via this dynamic.” For Steve Adams, “That sense of the socio- political implications of musical organization has also been an element of Rova’s thinking since the beginning.”

Rova

Rova’s connections to Morris and the idea of conducted improvisation are multiple. Formed in 1977, the quartet were working in parallel directions to create structured improvisation.

Both Rova and Butch Morris have their roots in California free jazz. Bruce Ackley recalls Morris living in the Bay Area on and off in the 1970s: “Around ’76 or ’77, Butch came nearly nightly to just listen at the space our group of improvisers ran, the Blue Dolphin, located in the San Francisco Castro District at that time. That’s when I first met him and started talking with him about music. I think the Blue Dolphin was a real hotbed of ideas in its infancy.” Jon Raskin remarks of the scene, “We covered open improvisation, non-idiomatic improvisation, games and structures of all kinds. Conducting improvisers was part of the things we did there.”

Larry Ochs’s regard for Morris dates from the first time Rova played in a Conduction at a 1988 German festival devoted to saxophone ensembles, with the last day devoted to a Morris piece in which all the groups—ranging from new-music ensembles that strictly play composed music to hard-driving pop jazz to free jazz and the broad perspective of Rova—participated following two days of rehearsal. Raskin remembers, “the soundness of his concept was exhilarating, so much so we invited Butch to work with a large ensemble in San Francisco.”

Six months later, Rova sponsored Conduction No. 11, Where Music Goes (New World 80479-2) at San Francisco’s Great American Music Hall, expanding to become the Rova PreEchoes Ensemble, a 13-member group that presages the current “No Favorites” band, including in its ranks four strings, electric guitars, and percussion.

Then in July 1990, Rova performed large group conductions with Morris as part of the International Creative Music Orchestra. Including musicians from as far afield as Lithuania and East Berlin, the orchestra played at the Vancouver Jazz Festival and the Goodwill Games Art Festival in Seattle, in a program that featured Ochs’s, Wayne Horvitz’s, and Rova large-ensemble compositions as well.

The methodological connection to conduction runs still deeper. From their outset, Rova have been involved in exploring structured improvisation, using game strategies, cueing systems and group members acting as conductors. Ochs writes, “Since late 1977, the musicians in Rova Saxophone Quartet have developed a set of strategies— ‘games,’ ‘events,’ ‘variables’—for use in structured improvisations. The goal of each structured improvisation is to compose a coherent piece of music as a group. In other words, the newly created piece, even though created spontaneously, should have an inherent logic to it, an audible architecture which facilitates and influences the ebb and flow of sonic materials. To say it in another way: In a structured improvisation, a framework is provided within which the musicians improvise; this framework defines the piece and influences its shape and feeling.” (“RADAR and Rova’s Development of Language for Structured Improvisation” [1999] http://rova.org/foodforthought/radar.html)

The series of gestures and techniques that define the structural components evolved through time, beginning with Rova’s first LP, Cinema Rovaté, and two pieces from the Trobar Clus series. Exposure to John Zorn’s game pieces led to the development of a further cued piece, Maintaining the Web Under Less than Obvious Circumstances, or The Web, performed as a quintet with Zorn in 1986, a contemporary parallel with Morris’s first Conduction recording.

The cueing language mutated into the more extensive system of the piece called Radar in the 1990s. What is most striking about the Rova cueing systems is that they open the floor to shared conductor duties with each musician assuming some of the cueing responsibilities within the structure of the piece. It’s in keeping with a band that once called a record The Crowd (honoring Elias Canetti, author of Crowds and Power, who described the conductor as the embodiment of a 19th-century leadership cult), that Rova have democratized the idea of the conductor. They also provide materials that make for subtle transitions between stages in a piece, highlighting the sense of listening to composed music. In the No Favorites program, there are multiple methodologies at work shifting from piece to piece, with the evolved Radar system apparent in Nothing Stopped/But A Future and Contours of the Glass Head.

The pieces

Each of the three extended pieces here includes a high degree of improvisation while embodying different compositional principles, the first and third employing conduction, the second graphic notation and simultaneity.

Larry Ochs’ Nothing Stopped/But A Future, dedicated to Buckminster Fuller, is the most methodologically complex of the three pieces here: The eleven musicians work their way through a score with movements and sub-movements with descriptive symbols (one wittily suggests “Play as if notated music is in front of you”), silences and solos; some of the individual parts have bits of conventional notation; the piece is performed with a conductor, composer/percussionist Gino Robair, who leads the musicians through the sequence, many of which permit free contributions, solos, and choices between strategies. There’s also a segment in the narrative that Ochs calls “Gino’s House,” introduced by Robair raising his arms above his head in the shape of a roof to signal an episode of relatively “pure” conduction.

Ochs’s multi-dimensional piece, with constantly shifting individual levels of freedom and constraint, achieves a mercurial effect. Impassioned voices arise and combine and disappear as suddenly as they arose. The outset bears a striking resemblance to the jazz tradition: Keening saxophone phrases dovetailing with one another over propulsive drums immediately suggest Charles Mingus’s assumption of Ellington timbres, a music that at once yearns and luxuriates, and which disappears almost as quickly as it arises. Even when playing similar patterns, the strings bring different timbres, attacks, decays, and overtones that are as much cultural as physical, Nothing Stopped/But A Future reaching toward both a synthesis and distinction of voices in some ways continuous with its very patterns of contrast and interruption, its brief and contrasting episodes reaching back to the disjunctive world enacted with John Zorn in the early “Web.”

The music endorses its complex methodology, its combination of notation, patterns, improvisation and conduction achieving levels of continuity, discord, change, and unpredictability that could be produced in no other way. There is clearly room for free expression here, sometimes the confluence of wild, expressive voices, and that freedom is that much more intense because of the abundant structure in which it arises, a piece in which Ochs’s narrative warns, “Eyes open at all times,” and threatens to dock pay for missed cues. Nothing Stopped/But A Future is a kind of omni- directional step alternately in and out of time in which that initial yearning melody might serve to introduce the dystopian press of the title or a kind of post-historical sonic pastoral.

The Double Negative presents a very different view of this edition of OrkestRova, presenting the three sub-groups as individual units in a series of three graphic scores, before they come together in a concluding simultaneity of the three pieces. True to the “no favorites” aesthetic, it presents highly distinct sets of instrumental timbres drawn in turn from classical, jazz, and rock genres.

The first segment is a performance of Jon Raskin’s “Flower Power,” a work from 2007 that’s part of a series of graphic scores, this one an explosion of petals and leaves along with a series of vertical lines indicating drones, the players moving independently through the parts. The quartet of strings bring incredible formal instincts to the piece, a kind of melodic continuum moving through the piece, at times suggesting Samuel Barber, at others birdsong played on an erhu, while supporting figures dovetail among the players, all touching at times on a particularly spiky vibrancy.

The second and third pieces are by Steve Adams. The first of these is “Graphic #38 (for Steve Lacy)”, the second “Graphic #41.” “Graphic #38” is played by Rova. Adams describes the way the two pieces work, “‘Graphic #38’ is in three sections, and each section is based on a scale or intervallic structure that is reminiscent of ones used by Lacy. The players are free to choose from a set of options based on that mode, with the added rule that no more than three people can be playing at any time in sections one and two, which are the only ones the quartet plays at this point in The Double Negative. Rova plays the tribute to Lacy, with Adams’ song-like alto floating out of the string piece.

If Rova assumes and purifies the strings’ lyricism, the power trio assumes the strings’ metallic angularity of line and sharp attacks in their approach to “Graphic #41.” Adams explains, “The score is read in three sections, first going once around the outer ‘satellites,’ then once around the outer triangle, concluding with the inner triangle. Letters represent concert pitches, and other elements are to be interpreted by the performer. When the guitar trio reaches the inner triangle, the string and saxophone quartets re-enter playing their scores, with the saxophones playing the third section of ‘#38’.” The simultaneity carries the work toward a new level of associations. That the players somehow shape this into a coherent whole is tribute to a fundamental musicality, a willingness and ability to both adhere to a score while shaping their lines for maximum impact.

Contours of the Glass Head returns to the technique of Conduction, but on Rova’s own democratic model, with the role of “conductionist” shifting when required among the quartet’s members. Originally developed for a collaboration with the InkBoat Dance Company in 2006, the piece contrasts with Nothing Stopped/But A Future in that its development is far smoother, more gradual, its specific sequence of improvisational techniques chosen to create a sense of large-scale evolution. For example, the second segment, called “Giants Steps” (4:40 to 7:58), is, according to Adams, “a series of group gestures working off the concept of weight, as if they were the steps of an immense creature, with silences between. This is eventually joined by a solo by Jon Raskin on baritone (6:20).” The seventh segment, “ ‘Telescope #2’ (20:35 to 24:40) has players start by droning on C, then begin to introduce short notes on random pitches. These other pitches should eventually settle on one other pitch, which is held longer each time it is played until it becomes the new drone note.” When it arises, Adams solos over the new drone chord.

“Contours” is a high achievement for structured improvisation, each section arising with the control and precision of a score, but each imbued as well with the sense of living tissue that distinguishes improvised music. It’s music of welling depth, its drones conveying senses of a collective tuning and individual extension that are far more than merely “musical,” instead conveying a sense of social processes that are at once both represented in the music and embodied there as well, in a continuum of constructive purpose. More remarkable still is the range of sounds and processes that are drawn into this process, whether it’s a moment of skittering play from the strings, the focused electric reverie achieved by guitarist John Shiurba, or a collective blow-out of saxophone blasts, honks and squeals that recall the grandfather of conduction, Sun Ra, leading his massed reeds in a vision of chaos. When the piece ends, it’s on a collective splintering crescendo that takes the music toward an original intensity, not the “greatest” or “highest” intensity necessarily, but an intensity that belongs uniquely to its moment.

Rova’s work here is more than a tribute to Morris’s techniques and accomplishments, resonating as well with the history of large-ensemble improvisation and a genuine need to transcend musical categories and discourses. The joy and power of this music develops directly from its combination of complexity and openness, its complexity in part a condition of its openness to other musics and ideas. There’s an on-going notion one might associate with Ornette Coleman’s 1962 Town Hall concert in which he presented his own trio, a string quartet playing his written music and then a merger of his own free jazz group with a rhythm & blues band. In the more than fifty years since, that inclusivist vision (shared by Morris with his claim to “No Favorites”) has expanded to the present work in which a class structure of genres has largely disappeared and in which instruments and ensembles are no longer segregated. Further, this music creates remarkable balances between the needs of all the communities involved, whether groups (of groups and individuals), whether musicians, conductors or audience, balancing impulses with constraints, aligning methodologies with results and creating a kind of continuous participatory democracy.

—Stuart Broomer, July 2016 - Copyright 2016 Anthology of Recorded Music. Used by permission

Stuart Broomer writes on music, mostly improvised, for several publications, among them Musicworks and the New York City Jazz Record. His column “Ezz-thetics” appears regularly at www.pointofdeparture.org. He is the author of Time and Anthony Braxton (Mercury, 2009) and co-author of Arrivals/Departures—New Horizons

♦ ♦ close this window ♦ ♦